Dateline: August 10th, 2005

[you will just have to trust, that is the date I saved these words]

Evolution v. Quantum Philosophy: FLIP/FLOP
[Black and white or ones and zeros.]
Connections...
Changes...
Absolutes...

They have flipped and guarantee flop. Based on the concept that there may be two types of thinkers: those that deal with reality and those that think it is chosen.

The Will to Power? The power of Will? Intentions play a big role in relationships and this breaks down into the two realms of Science and Religion. Will is recognized in ourselves and the supernatural. Is there really a difference? A relatively easier question is how we relate to others, and well as the world. Maybe a better model would have it as the material and the spiritual worlds. Two realities that are hard to deny but are realms that are separate yet maybe connected. Religions are not the master of the spiritual world any more than money is the master of the material. But there is no denying that intentions play a role in manifesting some reality.

The principle that there are absolutes, and that there should not be flip flop or understanding of others to better relate in this world is the main problem with the Neo-Con or Non-Thinking administration. Bush is reported to place intuition above intellect. Others report that his intuition is flawless. That is easy when one’s intellect does not recognize flaws and hypocrisy is the height of reality in that one can choose between schools of thought that often preempt facts, not to mention cause and effect.

8-10-05
Roger Larson

[Again, trust the date, but the subject I had in mind, may be more obtuse.]

Running Thoughts

PC v. PP
Peace Culture v. Power Points?
{"stand in the burning bush"}*
[Turning the Page]
[Honoring the Message]
Almost 'nuff said...(dot,dot,dot)

*post comment link inserted(not to agree with the theology)But note the possible separation of spiritual and material, the church and state, and reality of subjective and objective.

Serious Progress?

Many Key an ism?

The Key is the J-street news.
The Blockade* has had an ironic effect? [No disrespect to the ism or True Torah Jews or Zionism.*]

* there is a place for all people but there is a difference between having sovereignty and being it. I am only explaining the difference between perspectives and within Zionism the difference in recognizing a place at the table and apparently not. True Torah Jews do not believe in a Jewish State, that does not mean they don't believe in Israel. Zionism believes in the need for a Jewish State, while some don't recognize the need for a Palestinian State. As I understand the True Torah Jews, it seems close to Manicheanism, a separation of church and state, the spiritual and material, and a relationship to all. The commonality at least is in the support for the American Isreali relationship by both J-Street and True Torah Jews.

* correction (Flotilla)(no longer ironic)